Proposal: Strengthe...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Proposal: Strengthening BAI Liquidity with DAO Support

2 Posts
3 Users
0 Likes
265 Views
Avatar photo
Posts: 8
Admin
Topic starter
(@baiadmin)
Member
Joined: 1 year ago

Dear BAI Community,

Recent market movements have highlighted a liquidity issue in $BAI AMM pools. During the price surge from $0.25 to $1.20, we had to inject a significant amount of our own BAI reserves to enable trading and stabilize liquidity. After the pullback to $0.30, we reinvested all USDT earned plus additional BAI to further strengthen the pools, growing PancakeSwap liquidity from $2,000 to $26,000 and Uniswap from $2,500 to $10,000 making AMMs (DEXs) the primary source of trading for $BAI, whereas MEXC (CEX) previously held that role

While this has improved conditions, liquidity remains relatively small and needs to keep growing. Continuing to rely on development funds for liquidity is not sustainable, as these are meant to support BlockAI’s long-term growth, not to be locked in AMMs. The goal is to expand liquidity over time, making $BAI more accessible to new entrants.

Additionally, the circulating supply of $BAI is only 570,000, with 170,000 locked in the Waves DAO, leaving just 400,000 freely available. This limited availability is why there are so few sellers, leading to restricted market depth.

Proposed DAO Plan:

1️⃣ Release 100,000 $BAI from the DAO treasury.
2️⃣ Use these funds strictly for liquidity on PancakeSwap & Uniswap in a dedicated wallet.
3️⃣ Maintain sell orders at the top of the range (e.g., $0.30 – $0.80) to minimize price impact.
4️⃣ Reinvest raised stablecoins to strengthen liquidity across all price levels.

Why This Matters:

Better liquidity → Easier entry for new buyers.
Sustainable growth → Reduces reliance on development reserves.
Stable market → Supports long-term adoption.

This is the same approach we used during the last rally, but this time, it would be community-backed and sustainable.

Would you support this proposal? Let’s discuss! ⬇️

1 Reply
Posts: 5
Registered
(@pascal-parvex)
Active Member
Joined: 1 year ago

Shouldn't the price be higher, when only a few sellers cater to the demand?

Reply
Share: